ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>The aim of this study was to compare the short-term outcomes for hand-assisted, laparoscopic, and open resection for rectal cancer.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Three hundred ninety patients with rectal cancer who underwent curative resection between June 2009 and June 2012 were included. Patients were classified into a hand-assisted group (HALS, n=101), a laparoscopic surgery group (LS, n=157), and an open surgery group (OS, n=132). Patient and disease characteristics, operative parameters, postoperative morbidity, pathological results and length of recovery were compared among three groups.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The mean operating time was (173±39) min for the HALS group, (231±61) min for the LS group, and (173±39) min for the OS group (P<0.01). Conversion rates did not differ between HALS and LS groups (2.0% vs 3.2%, P=0.708). The overall complication rates were 11.9%, 11.5%, and 19.7% in the HALS, LS and OS groups respectively (P=0.100). The specimen quality with a specimen length, distal resection margin, harvested lymph nodes, and positive lymph nodes did not differ among the three groups. Patients in the HALS and LS groups recovered significantly faster than those from the OS group.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>This comparative study shows that HALS and LS can reproduce the equivalent short-term results of standard OS. HALS retained the minimal invasive advantages of LS, and significantly shorten the operation time.</p>
Subject(s)
Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Laparoscopy , Methods , Laparotomy , Rectal Neoplasms , General Surgery , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
The application of robotic surgery can provide solutions to the many drawbacks of traditional laparoscopic surgery.Robotic surgery is a feasible and safe procedure for patients with gastrointestinal tumor.It can harvest adequate lymph node with low postoperative morbidity.Longer follow-up and further raudomized clinical trials are needed to validate the utility and efficacy of this technology in the field of gastrointestinal surgery.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the diagnosis and surgical therapy of multiple primary colorectal carcinoma. Methods From 1998 to 2007, 47 patients with synchronous multiple primary colorectal carcinoma and 20 cases with metachronous carcinoma were treated in our hospital. Results In these 67 cases of multiple primary colorectal carcinoma, synchronous carcinoma (SC) accounted for 70% (47 cases) including 37 rectal cancer with a total of 95 larger bowel cancer lesions. There were 6 cases with Dukes A stage, 22 cases with Dukes B stage, 15 cases with Dukes C stage and 4 cases with Dukes D stage. In this whole group there were 20 cases with lymph node metastasis, 21 cases with adenoma and multiple polyps in SC. Three cases received total coloectomy, 10 cases did subtotal coloectomy, 34 cases were treated by radical resection and intestine segment resection. In 20 metachronous carcinoma cases, there were 31 colon cancer(70%) with a total of 44 intestinal cancer lesions. Altogether, there were 17 cases with two tumors, 2 cases with three tumors, one case with four tumors. The duration between the first and the last carcinoma was from 7 months to 19 years, including less than two years in 7 cases, from two to five years in 5 cases, and more than five years in 8 cases. In all 20 MC cases the first (primary) carcinoma received radical resection, while radical resection was performed for the secondary carcinoma in 14 cases and for the third carcinoma in 2 cases. In the SC and the primary carcinoma of MC patients who received radical resection, the 5-year survival rates were 74% and 78% respectively. Conclusion In cases of colonic carcinoma we shouldn't be satisfied with the diagnosis of single colon tumor before a thorough screening of the whole colon was made. In radical resection surgery for SC or MC cases an attempt to preserve enough residual intestinal tract should be made in order to improve the life quality of post-operative patients.
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the efficacy of transrectal ultrasonography(TRUS)and spiral computed tomography(SCT)in preoperative staging of rectal carcinoma contrasted with the postoperative pathologic findings.Methods Both TRUS and SCT were performed prior to surgery in 92 patients with rectal carcinoma.After radical operation,the preoperative findings were compared with the histological findings,and the the efficacy of TRUS and SCT in staging the rectal carcinoma were evaluated.Results The accuracy of TRUS for T stage and N stage was 87.0% and 64.1% respectively,while the accuracy of SCT was 68.5% and 66.3%.Conclusions TRUS is superior to SCT for the judgment of tumor infiltration depth,TRUS may become the first choice in preoperative staging of rectal carcinoma.But neither is able to provide satisfaction assessment for lymph node metastases.When both methods are used together,it would be better.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the clinical value of three-dimensional ultrasonography(3DUS) for breast cancer operation. Methods Sixty-eight patients with breast cancer were examined with two-dimensional ultrasonography(2DUS) and three-dimensional ultrasonography before operation. Results 3DUS not only improved the rate of sonography's diagnosis for breast cancer(88.2 % for two-dimension, 94.1 % for three-dimension), but also clearly showed patterns of breast lumps with the neighboring structure and the adjacent three-dimensional relations and the level of violations, such as the skin, chest muscle, chest wall, etc(the display rate is 75.0 %, 63.6 % and 60.0 % respectively). And it displayed the blood stream distribution in the mass of breast tumor more clearly and sensitively (95.6%). Conclusions 3DUS demonstrated the tumor's configuration, relations and the blood stream distribution. It had great significance in the operation for breast cancer.